1) She disagreed what the guy said before and tried examplify why he wasn’t right. He said Frank Gehry's buildings are interesting just for few time, then they become boring. However, Yhinny his buildings are all over the world. It means, people like his work so much that they are spread around the world.
2) No, I totally disagree. It can looks uncomfortable and useless in first view because it is different and unknown, but the best innvations generate changes. Professionals of all areas have to break paradigms. If all projects were designed only to supply a function, the discovery of the new would be delayed. Leaving of the comfort zone is essential for the generation of new styles. Combining between function and aesthetic is completely possible and works such as franklin inspire it happen.
3) I could realize they don’t agree with this affirmation. At least a girl said Frank Gehry uses old building material to build his projects and it is better than throwing them away. I don’t know so much about how he works, but it is important to know that to worry about the environment is not just using old materials, it is also to think where it will be build or how it will affect the people, for example. So, maybe this statement comes from issues such as it.
It is a very nice opinion, show completely the other side of the Michaels point of view.
ReplyDeleteI liked you second answers. All artist need to break paradigms. They need to have a great combination between function and aesthetics, I think that Michael has a wrong idea about what's and artist. Nice opinion!
ReplyDelete